Im stuck in a time loop and need help

Curious Time Enthusiast said:
So you do believe that @BodaciousJohn is being truthful.
Click to expand...
No. He came onto the forum for a few minutes two years ago, made 6 posts that day and disappeared never to post again. It's a common practice of hit-and-run posting starting with the OP which was a copy & paste from another site. He didn't offer anything upon which you could conclude the alternative hypothesis (HA) "He was being truthful" was true. So you reject the alternative hypothesis and go with the null hypothesis (HO), "He was not being truthful".
 
Darby said:
Unless you define the terms "anti time", "time loop" and "time slip" I don't believe that anyone could explain "that". A tautology such as, "A time loop is a loop in time" isn't a definition. "Anti time" "time loop" and "time slip" would also need a definition of "time" that suggests that it has "anti" and "looped" versions and that it somehow can "slip". As you define your terms you might want to avoid using "abt", "cuz" and "u". It digs into one's credibility as a writer. Just saying. They're your definitions to offer however you want to offer them.

We don't have to define every term we use if we are using terms that we have a well founded reason to believe that almost everyone agrees on the meaning. But when it comes to alt-sci/Internet jargon it isn't likely that anyone agrees on the definitions. So it's helpful, especially when we are discussing science (and you did bring up science), that everyone is on the same page. Everyone won't agree with your definitions but at least they will know what you mean when using the jargon.

If you think I'm trolling you, you're wrong. I have no idea what you when you use the above terms.
Click to expand...
Anti-time is a theoretical concept of time running in reverse, or as a negative directional dimension. The reason i was so shocked was that @PaulaJedi and @bodacious were talking about traveling back in time so casually , as it was a normal thing. I mean, i see science compromised in the entire discussion. I saw no skeptics here. Its just like i say " Oh I jumped off a building and started to float, and you will be like , woah, what floor it was, how high did u float, and stuff.. Floating is possible under certain conditions.. But as a sane person you should be asking HOW DID I DEFY GRAVITY? that is the approach to get nearer to the truth.. Skepticism.. I am curious about the time travel situations too but this leads us nowhere. I thought this was an educational platform so i joined in, only to realize .. You know what i mean..
And how funny it is , that you find jargons problematic but not science being compromised.. I am not trolling you either. Just questioning SKEPTICISM. Though some are.. There is nothing with me i will just move out of this place.
 
Curious Time Enthusiast said:
Anti-time is a theoretical concept of time running in reverse
Click to expand...
Ah-ha. This is known as time reversal symmetry or T-Symmetry. In classical physics it works just fine. In classical mechanics you can theoretically know the position and momentum of every particle in the universe and completely work out every last detail of their past by retracing their "steps". But the real world is defined by quantum mechanics and not classical mechanics. For a true time reversal you would have to know the exact momentum and position of every particle in the universe (or in your closed system in the laboratory. That, however, is impossible. The Uncertainty Principle says, and is proven to be correct, that the more information you know about one (momentum or position) the less you know about the other (position or momentum). If you knew exactly what the position of a particle was you would know absolutely nothing about its momentum and vice-versa.

Running the universe's "clock" backwards won't recreate the past. It will create a completely new record of events. The longer the "clock" runs the less influence the original orientation of the particles will have. Classical physics is strictly deterministic where quantum systems evolve probabilistically and have intrinsic uncertainties.
 
Curious Time Enthusiast said:
And how funny it is , that you find jargons problematic
Click to expand...
Jargon is always problematic when used in a general setting. It's problematic because the definition of jargon is, "Special words, phrases or expressions that are used by a particular profession or group that, without definition, are difficult for others to understand."

Example: I've been deeply associated with the scientific community, the world of law enforcement, the intelligence community, college baseball as a player and coach, multiple non-profit corporations as an officer and as you might guess country western culture. Each of those groups have their specific jargon that I could use to confuse and confound (or bore to sleep) you or anyone else who had no prior involvement with them. If I thought about using specific jargon in a post it would be my responsibility to either not use the jargon and choose words that could describe the thought but in a more common language or I could use the jargon while inserting a definition as needed.

This is why most of my posts are longer than the average. I try to use the proper jargon when appropriate and then explain. People can take the time (or not) to read the post and see my response and possibly come away with more knowledge about the subject than before reading the post. When I think it is necessary and appropriate I also include "footnotes" in the form of URLs that point to the source material I relied on. I want the reader to be able to evaluate the response for themselves rather than gullibly taking my word without any offer of proof.
 
Last edited:
Curious Time Enthusiast said:
Rex? What are u talking abt? time loops are possible only if anti time was possible. How would u explain th
Click to expand...

Curious Time Enthusiast said:
Anti-time is a theoretical concept of time running in reverse, or as a negative directional dimension. The reason i was so shocked was that @PaulaJedi and @bodacious were talking about traveling back in time so casually , as it was a normal thing. I mean, i see science compromised in the entire discussion. I saw no skeptics here. Its just like i say " Oh I jumped off a building and started to float, and you will be like , woah, what floor it was, how high did u float, and stuff.. Floating is possible under certain conditions.. But as a sane person you should be asking HOW DID I DEFY GRAVITY? that is the approach to get nearer to the truth.. Skepticism.. I am curious about the time travel situations too but this leads us nowhere. I thought this was an educational platform so i joined in, only to realize .. You know what i mean..
And how funny it is , that you find jargons problematic but not science being compromised.. I am not trolling you either. Just questioning SKEPTICISM. Though some are.. There is nothing with me i will just move out of this place.
Click to expand...

Time travel to the past is only a "problem with science" if you're only considering speed of light.

I am SKEPTICAL about your assumption that there is only one way to travel.

Show me what "jargon" I'm using and I'll explain it to you the best I can. As for Rex, click the guy's link and you'll see what I'm talking about.

I think outside the box. I'll turn a rock into a satellite dish if I have to. And yeah, maybe I did mean Schrodinger's.
(geek joke)
 
Darby said:
Jargon is always problematic when used in a general setting. It's problematic because the definition of jargon is, "Special words, phrases or expressions that are used by a particular profession or group that, without definition, are difficult for others to understand."

Example: I've been deeply associated with the scientific community, the world of law enforcement, the intelligence community, college baseball as a player and coach, multiple non-profit corporations as an officer and as you might guess country western culture. Each of those groups have their specific jargon that I could use to confuse and confound (or bore to sleep) you or anyone else who had no prior involvement with them. If I thought about using specific jargon in a post it would be my responsibility to either not use the jargon and choose words that could describe the thought but in a more common language or I could use the jargon while inserting a definition as needed.

This is why most of my posts are longer than the average. I try to use the proper jargon when appropriate and then explain. People can take the time (or not) to read the post and see my response and possibly come away with more knowledge about the subject than before reading the post. When I think it is necessary and appropriate I also include "footnotes" in the form of URLs that point to the source material I relied on. I want the reader to be able to evaluate the response for themselves rather than gullibly taking my word without any offer of proof.
Click to expand...
I've been deeply associated with the scientific community, the world of law enforcement, the intelligence community

Wow, we could have really used you. It's hard to find people with all three backgrounds in one person. Over here, we are tripping over each other because everything has to be handed off to different specialists, especially technology nobody is familiar with or ever seen before.
 
TrapperND said:
I've been deeply associated with the scientific community, the world of law enforcement, the intelligence community

Wow, we could have really used you. It's hard to find people with all three backgrounds in one person. Over here, we are tripping over each other because everything has to be handed off to different specialists, especially technology nobody is familiar with or ever seen before.
Click to expand...
I was in the the Intelligence community, worked in consulting gigs that supported law enforcement and of course had an interest in the Scientific community. I feel like got stuck in a parallel universe.
 
C2016 said:
I was in the the Intelligence community, worked in consulting gigs that supported law enforcement and of course had an interest in the Scientific community. I feel like got stuck in a parallel universe.
Click to expand...

how do you mean you feel like you got stuck in a parallel universe?
 
TrapperND said:
how do you mean you feel like you got stuck in a parallel universe?
Click to expand...
I am not professing to be a time traveler, I just feel like I got stuck in an alternate universe/reality. I am not cray cray lol. Its just like things are noticeably different from my so called life on several different wavelengths. I am not into pouring my business out and am not looking for attention. Its just something is off, really really off. I actually read someone saying that in late 2015 there was some gravitational wave that hit the planet ( there are two facilities one in Louisiana and Washington State that measured it) and it shifted a lot of things. Most people notice how time seemed to speed up incredibly fast since than. This is just my thoughts.
 
C2016 said:
I am not professing to be a time traveler, I just feel like I got stuck in an alternate universe/reality. I am not cray cray lol. Its just like things are noticeably different from my so called life on several different wavelengths. I am not into pouring my business out and am not looking for attention. Its just something is off, really really off. I actually read someone saying that in late 2015 there was some gravitational wave that hit the planet ( there are two facilities one in Louisiana and Washington State that measured it) and it shifted a lot of things. Most people notice how time seemed to speed up incredibly fast since than. This is just my thoughts.
Click to expand...

So, when you say things seem really really off, do you mean culturally? Like traditions and people's behavior? Or, do you mean physical objects have changed? Or, do you mean history is different from what you remember? What is the thing that seems the most off to you?
 
C2016 said:
I actually read someone saying that in late 2015 there was some gravitational wave that hit the planet ( there are two facilities one in Louisiana and Washington State that measured it) and it shifted a lot of things. Most people notice how time seemed to speed up incredibly fast since than.
Click to expand...

Gravitational waves caused by some event far far far away aren't going to change anything here on earth. They are impossible to even detect unless you have access to some extremely advanced (and equally expensive) detectors.

If I set the strength of the electric charge on an electron to 1, then the relative strength of gravity is:

0.000000000000000000000000000000000000000001 (10^-42)

"Most people [didn't] notice how time seemed to speed up" in 2015. Most people weren't even aware that gravitational waves were first detected in 2015 by the Laser Interferometer Gravitational-Wave Observatory (LIGO). You are correct. LIGO has a facility in Washington and another in Louisiana. As I said, it took advanced and expensive equipment. LIGO cost $1.1 Billion to build. These waves are so incredibly weak that it took 100 years to invent technology that could detect them (Einstein predicted them in 1915).
 
C2016 said:
Non sto dicendo di essere un viaggiatore del tempo, mi sento solo come se fossi rimasto bloccato in un universo/realtà alternativo. Non sono pazzo pazzo lol. È solo che le cose sono notevolmente diverse dalla mia cosiddetta vita su diverse lunghezze d'onda. Non mi piace sfogare i miei affari e non cerco attenzione. È solo che qualcosa non va, davvero molto. In realtà ho letto qualcuno che diceva che alla fine del 2015 c'è stata un'onda gravitazionale che ha colpito il pianeta (ci sono due strutture, una in Louisiana e una nello stato di Washington, che l'hanno misurata) e ha spostato un sacco di cose. La maggior parte delle persone nota come il tempo sembra accelerare incredibilmente velocemente da allora. Questi sono solo i miei pensieri.
Click to expand...
Ti capisco io mi sveglio in più universi
 
BodaciousJohn said:
Ciao, per motivi di anonimato sono BodaciousJohn e sono rimasto bloccato in un loop temporale per 105 iterazioni (questo numero è bloccato nella mia testa e non sono sicuro se sia il numero reale o quello che ho memorizzato per non perdere la ragione da uno molto più grande). Il loop termina a marzo 2024 e, 24 ore dopo l'inizio del loop, che è l'inizio del 2022, perdo la memoria fino ad aprile 2023, dopodiché sperimento una "rinascita" della memoria in cui inizio a ricordare alcuni dei loop precedenti. È anche qui che sperimento una serie di eventi chiave che verificano il loop a me stesso. Questi eventi sono i seguenti:

  1. Un ragazzo al parco che indossa una tuta nera, una giacca a quadri e occhiali da sole neri in stile Hollywood con la montatura blu mentre porta a spasso il suo labrador nero (questo evento è concreto e costante)
  2. un uomo latino che parla al telefono a tre auto di distanza da me al negozio, dove parcheggiamo esattamente nello stesso posto. La sua posizione non cambia mai, e lui parla sempre al telefono…
  3. il ricordo dell'omicidio di mia moglie... e le iterazioni di perdita e successo in esso contenute...
Il mio obiettivo nel contattarmi (e nell'umiliarmi sommariamente) è duplice:

1 salvare mia moglie attraverso la pacificazione dei suoi aspiranti assassini (non sto cercando situazioni da killer, solo amici che potrebbero essere lì per aiutarli a disarmarli e farsi pagare in cibo da festa, ad esempio alcol e divertimento. Il ciclo finisce lì perché mi uccido a causa della sua perdita)

2. Cercare modi per uscire da questo ciclo dopo aver salvato mia moglie, e cercare altre iterazioni di me stesso che esistevano al di fuori del ciclo, ma che sono rimaste intrappolate qui.

So che le mie affermazioni sono enormi... ma tutto ciò che chiedo è un orecchio onesto, una fetta del vostro tempo, un minimo di fede e il grado di civiltà che sto dimostrando in cambio. Ho pubblicato su reddit, 4chan, abovetopsecret.com , e ora sono qui a cercare aiuto e umiliarmi in due... Sono esausto e ho bisogno di trovare un modo per risolvere la situazione... o almeno salvare mia moglie in modo da rendere sopportabile il ciclo a mia volta...

Il mio canale YouTube, dove in seguito pubblicherò le mie esperienze e dove potrete contattarmi facilmente (aggiungerò il link qui il prima possibile):

https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCjwzjvcg2oO8cvFK-wG02IA
Click to expand...
 
Back
Top