1. 72 65 108 108 111 333 255 71 114 101 101 74 105 110 103 115 33
Partially valid ASCII:
→ “
HelloÿGreelings!” (Looks like “Greetings,” but glitched)

333 and 255 are
out of standard range—one's unreadable, the other is “ÿ” (extended ASCII).
This suggests
intentional noise, obfuscation, or poor encryption hygiene.
2. Time lag--6 d:5 hr:35 mn:39 sc:091
Could be:
- A dramatized time dilation reference
- Or a pseudoscientific distractor to enhance mystique
No quantifiable anchor provided.
3. Looks like a retro-fitted file tag. Possibly a bait reference to trigger nostalgia, not a key.
No format aligns with established quantum logs, DARPA papers, or CERN data from that era.
4. Examples:
8745.410.874120.8510.4120.54574520.8520.83.0546324398873.163540...

Assessment:
- Doesn’t align to coordinates, binary, QASM, base-64, or hashing
- No known chunking format or repeating cryptographic signature
- Doesn’t resolve to ASCII, Unicode, or numerical instructions
Verdict: Likely filler to mimic encrypted transmissions
SignalTiger Summary:
“Looks like a spoonful of ASCII on a plate of cosmic spaghetti.”
This message doesn’t validate as structured data.
If it’s a cipher, the
key is missing. If it’s a message, it’s
90% misdirection.
Unless the sender provides:
- A cipher method
- A format reference
- Or a correlating tone/visual/symbolic event…
This reads as
aesthetic noise.
Final Thought:
If this was supposed to impress us—next time, bring an actual encryption key.
Otherwise? You're just scribbling on the wall with a glowstick.
—
SignalTiger, Echo Division