Sign off time on Titor

P

pinterest

Temporal Navigator
Kind note to MOD, please place or move this to where applicable.Thank you.

Because the saga of said time traveler John Titor does contain some affiliative associative proof and there is a scientific principle titled closure of proof, this issue does regardless of any other attachments, does now have to be laid down as a scientific principle only.

The issue that makes this a stop gap commitment, is the proposed use of nuclear weapons as a said result of social pressure so effective the perceived time index.This is year 2015 and in the relaying of circumstances, from said time traveler, this had been the key year for the said conflagration.

So in suggesting topic values only, not associative principles with creative writing and or rights having anything to do with a said similar story, other than mild proof.I am arresting interest in this subject.

*proof morsil, said time traveler show at Art Bell's BBS and claiming in considerable detail a malfunction with an e-board device within said time traveler's time displacement device.

Most graciously, Pinter

 
Kind note to MOD, please place or move this to where applicable.Thank you.Because the saga of said time traveler John Titor does contain some affiliative associative proof and there is a scientific principle titled closure of proof, this issue does regardless of any other attachments, does now have to be laid down as a scientific principle only.The issue that makes this a stop gap commitment, is the proposed use of nuclear weapons as a said result of social pressure so effective the perceived time index.This is year 2015 and in the relaying of circumstances, from said time traveler, this had been the key year for the said conflagration.
So in suggesting topic values only, not associative principles with creative writing and or rights having anything to do with a said similar story, other than mild proof.I am arresting interest in this subject.

*proof morsil, said time traveler show at Art Bell's BBS and claiming in considerable detail a malfunction with an e-board device within said time traveler's time displacement device.

Most graciously, Pinter
Click to expand...
I'm giving it until the end of the year as he didn't really give a date for the war. I will always sleep with one eye open, though.
 
Kind note to MOD, please place or move this to where applicable.Thank you.Because the saga of said time traveler John Titor does contain some affiliative associative proof and there is a scientific principle titled closure of proof, this issue does regardless of any other attachments, does now have to be laid down as a scientific principle only.The issue that makes this a stop gap commitment, is the proposed use of nuclear weapons as a said result of social pressure so effective the perceived time index.This is year 2015 and in the relaying of circumstances, from said time traveler, this had been the key year for the said conflagration.
So in suggesting topic values only, not associative principles with creative writing and or rights having anything to do with a said similar story, other than mild proof.I am arresting interest in this subject.

*proof morsil, said time traveler show at Art Bell's BBS and claiming in considerable detail a malfunction with an e-board device within said time traveler's time displacement device.

Most graciously, Pinter
Click to expand...
Pinter,English isn't your primary language. That's not a problem. What is a bit of a problem is that you pick complex English words, insert them into your sentences and they are malaprops at best. In any case your sentences usually make no sense.

Because the saga of said time traveler John Titor does contain some affiliative associative proof and there is a scientific principle titled closure of proof, this issue does regardless of any other attachments, does now have to be laid down as a scientific principle only.
Click to expand...
What is "affiliative associative proof"? It sounds like bad techno-babble. Where did you see a scientific principle named "closure of proof"? I've never heard of it and it doesn't pop up on a Google search. And "does now have to be laid down as a scientific principle only" is garbled nonsense in the context of the sentence. What has to be laid down as a scientific principle and what scientific principle are you referring to?You should dial it back and use simple English so we can understand what it is that you're trying to communicate.

 
Back
Top